Here’s finally something positive to come out of the Korean Peninsular in recent days.
Great innovation to promote a movie by simply providing ‘wifi posters,’eg 8 strategically placed posters in Seoul that allowed users to access the internet when near them. I have been saying for the longest time that all interactive communications in 2013 and beyond needs to be either:
- useful, and/or
If it isn’t, then your chances of your brand being noticed are very low.
- The movie had 29% increase in traffic to its website (although I think upfront awareness for the movie is more important than site traffic personally. I would have preferred those metrics)
- Time spent on movie website increased by 500%
- In addition:
This is a very simple idea but one which provided significant added value to the consumer and likely created more ‘love marks’ for the product eg the movie.
Media is being completely redefined by technology and cultural change, which is why there is so much potential for brands with the evolution of traditional media, as well as the increase in new platforms and devices.
The four key words going forward ?
- Measure (properly!)
You get the idea! Hehe.
I find this situation absolutely ridiculous and just demonstrates how the digital explosion in recent months (that is only just beginning) is not being understood or embraced by all brands.
Take this Australian bricks and mortar store, for example, called Celiac Supplies, “Brisbane’s only gluten and wheat free store.”
They have started charging customers a $5 ‘Just looking fee’ that is deducted from your final bill if you buy something in the bricks and mortar store! This to prevent the estimated 60 people a week from getting advice from the owner about products in store and then buying elsewhere, often online.
Here is the note they posted in store, informing of the Just looking fee:
This is a fantastic example of how commerce is evolving in 2013 and beyond and how some businesses are simply not adjusting to the new reality of consumers having more control than ever these days.
With the internet, consumers have so much information and choice available to them when selecting products, that bricks and mortar stores are becoming a place to physically see and feel products after having Googled online. Often purchases are completed online in this scenario, not in store.
Brands have to find new ways to provide value with their bricks and mortar stores, as well as improve and facilitate the e-commerce experience.
Australian glasses company, Eyehub, for example, is doing just that by offering the following in their stores to create user value :
- Playback mirrors – an interactive mirror, that allows you to record yourself wearing different glasses and compare them.
- Simulator zones – they simulate real world situations via a wind tunnel room for cyclists, and a glare simulator for skiers
- Children’s education zone – teaching kids about the importance of protecting eyes etc
So the key is to not be afraid of the new world of interactivity with regards to commerce, but rather adjust your existing business models to provide usefulness or entertainment to consumers in their purchase process, and test, test, test.
But charging a ‘Just looking fee’ is not the solution ! Perhaps the scenario could be flipped so that Australian consumers could start charging Celiac Supplies an ‘online time wasting fee’ when they discover they can’t buy any of their products online.
It would make about as much sense!
A current buzzword that we hear a lot about is “social media monitoring” that seems a very nebulous term and appears at first to be difficult to define, and somewhat tricky to determine its value to brands.
Here is a great example showing the importance of social media monitoring – KitKat noticed this tweet by someone on Twitter that contained their brand name:
By using tools to monitor what was being said about their brand online, they noticed the tweet, they identified an opportunity to engage both a consumer talking about their brand(who appears at a quick glance to be a brand advocate) whilst simultaneously engaging another brand, Oreo.
This is what they tweeted in reply:
And this is how Oreo countered the cheeky tweet by KitKat:
Notice how the tones of both of these tweets from both brands are almost lighthearted banter – the chosen tone is absolutely key to engaging consumers and brands, and both brands nailed it in my opinion.
But KitKat often uses current events as the basis of some simple but entertaining and RELEVENT communications online, like this one when the new pope was elected.
- Listen daily to what people are saying about your brand online – not only can it be a customer service channel, it can be a product development channel, a brand evolution channel and certainly a consumer engagement channel. Don’t just put the youngest person in your marketing department in charge of social – it is potentially one of your most important channels to build (or destroy) your brand. Would you let an intern be your CEO?!!
- Have systems/procedures in place that allow you to reply very quickly. ‘Agility’ is the key word and most brands in 2013 are continuing with outdated, historic procedures and processes that do not reflect the capability for real time communications, listening, reacting to topical news stories, tweets and Facebook posts. Kit Kat took 2 days to reply to the initial Tweet from the consumer, and Oreo replied within 7 hours to the KitKat tweet! That means Oreo noticed the KitKat tweet, planned a strategy to counter it, came up with an idea, got client approval, executed it, and tweeted it within 7 hours! 99.9% of brands are not capable of doing that and they should be in 2013.
- Use current events for some of your brand content – it is relevent, entertaining and will be appreciated and noticed by consumers.
Those brands that are agile, creative, forward thinking and recognize the multi directional, real time communications that are taking place without them online, will reap HUGE benefits for their brands if they put some social skin in the game!
For those of us who work in advertising/marketing, please consider your EXACT target group when deciding whether to allocate dollars to reaching them on the internet.
Although the stats are based on Quebec market, the key takeaway of my post will be similar in most developed countries.
And here’s why.
We often hear that internet penetration rate is approx 75% in Quebec (CEFRIO confirmed that is currently 74,5%) but here is the key,
IT IS FOR ALL QUEBEC ADULTS AS AN AVERAGE.
If we break down the target groups, let’s see what the penetration rate is and whether we should simply allocate a few dollars to web as an afterthought behind TV.
How many Quebec adults have used internet in week preceding the survey – Demographic Breakdown (Jan 2013, CEFRIO)
- Adults 18-24: 100% (yup!)
- Adults 25-34: 94,4% (Not far from 100% is it and these are not teenagers)
- Adults 35-44: 90,1% (Yes, 9 out of 10 adults in this key target group)
- Adults 55+ 53,2% (Much lower than the others but is this your key target usually – it can be, but not generally)
- Households with family income exceeding $60k: 89%
- Students: 100%
- Professionals: 88%
- Service and sales sector: 87,8%
- Some college or university education: 86,3%
For the majority of key demographic groups , the web penetration rate is approx 90 – 100%. It is merely the heavily weighted older demographic of 55+ that brings the overall rate down to approx 75%.
It is very important for brand managers, marketing directors and ad agencies who allocate $ to engage these groups via marketing initiatives to know this key fact.
So please let’s not hear the wrong perception that ‘internet does not provide us with reach.’
It is quite simply not true.
Not only does Internet provide us reach as marketers, but it provides us with an:
- lean forward,
- sharable reach…when it’s done well ! And this is not just banners, page takeovers and big ‘in your face’ visuals.
Look what our colleagues at 360i did in US – The Great Bacon Barter
I have decided to create a regular feature called S.M.U.T that identifies recent social media updates to Facebook, Google, Twitter etc that I consider to be significant.
The goal of these posts will be to provide my marketing/media friends with latest social media changes in a concise, visual way with videos, images and examples.
Today in S.M.U.T #1, I shall explain the following 3 interesting social media updates:
- Facebook Social Graph Search
- Increase in size of Facebook link previews
- Different Facebook post organic reach, by post type
So here goes :
1, Facebook Social Graph search
- Launched in small beta on January 15th to ‘hundreds or thousands of Facebook users'(very small test)
- Allows Facebook users to search for various things such as music, restaurants, bars and much more, based on what their friends like and have interacted with – this social context makes search results more credible to the user
Here is an excellent video (that my good friend Carlos Pacheco) made me aware of that I find is an excellent demonstration of its functionality/capabilities – click on image below to view it.
If you want an excellent textual summary of ‘4 reasons why marketers should be interested in Graph search’ (when it becomes available), click on our Dentsu partner’s, 360i, logo below to go to concise blog post about it:
2, Increase in size of link previews in Facebook
- According to Facebook, it seems that they are increasing the size of link previews when you post a link (other than a Youtube video link.)
- Size of image to double from 90 x 90 pixels to 154 x 154
- More space for text
- Greater chance that fans (of brands) or friends (of individual Facebook users) will see their posts and links, due to greater visual visibility on page
Here is the difference in size with the new 154 x 154 pixel link preview format vs previous 90 x 90:
An example of a Jame Oliver post link preview (not exact size but just to show what an actual link preview looks like) :
3. Facebook post organic reach – different by post type
It seems that Facebook organic post reach is different according to post type (eg the number of friends or fans who are exposed to your Facebook posts, without you increasing post reach by paid advertising .)
- For video, images and link posts: 8-9% of your Facebook fans or friends will see them
- For text status posts, 11-19% of your Facebook fans or friends will see them
Here is a post from social bakers that shows the decrease in overall organic Facebook post reach up to October 2012 – it contains the following very interesting visual for marketers
I shall try in future to regularly give social media updates in a clear concise fashion that requires little effort on your part, that will allow media, marketing and brand strategists to retain key takeaways quickly. I hope this was a helpful post. Everybody loves SMUT !
There are two recent Facebook changes I want to discuss.
1. Change to Facebook Timeline
It would appear that the Facebook changes to Timeline that were being tested in November and December of last year are now being seen in certain limited markets like New Zealand. This is what one New Zealand Facebook User saw this week :
So what are the key changes to Timeline ?
- 2 column newsfeed to one column
- Right hand column now limited to : Recent activity, friends and other non messaging updates
- Highlighted posts including life events can no longer be stretched across the page
- Boxes that linked to friends, photos, maps and likes no longer appear by default – they appear via a menu
- A ‘more’ tab offers access to about, friends, photos, maps, movies, TV shows, and music
- Relationship status has gone from the header
- Friends are now called followers (sound familiar!)
- Your job, where you live and your schooling now appears next to your profile pic, not below it
2. Paid Facebook Messaging
Following its IPO last year, Facebook continues to find new monetization methods.
It is currently testing a paid messages program that will :
- enable users to reach out to those outside their network of friends for a fee of $1 per message, paid by credit card.
Although the service is early in the testing phase, it holds potential to alter the messaging function for both brands and consumers alike.
It is currently only be tested on individual’s Facebook pages but if successful, is likely to be rolled out onto brand pages.
For example, if you want to send a message to someone you heard speak at an event but are not friends with, or if you want to message someone about a job opportunity, you can use this feature to reach their Inbox
However, an AYTM survey of Facebook users about this capability, found the vast majority in opposition—90% of users said they would definitely not pay $1 !!
But would you like to message Mark Zuckerberg?
Currently, the social network giant is testing different price ranges with a select number of Facebook users and has, seemingly, put a hefty price on being able to message Facebook’s CEO.
Certain individuals are being given the chance to do this for $100 per message. It doesn’t mean he’ll read it apparently but it won’t go into his ‘other’ folder ! This is how they can do it:
Hopefully, Zuckerberg is still using Facebook and hasn’t moved to Tumblr like most people of his age! Average age of Facebook user is now 38 ! True dat !